When NDAs Go Too Far
Non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) aim to protect confidential information, but defining \"confidential\" is pivotal. Factors like oppressive clauses, irrelevant information protection, and misidentification can invalidate NDAs. The infamous Trump-Daniels case exemplifies these concerns. Crafting valid NDAs demands balancing secrecy and free speech, with courts assessing the information\'s value, NDA scope, fairness, and public interest.
