When NDAs Go Too Far
Non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) aim to protect confidential information, but defining \”confidential\” is pivotal. Factors like oppressive clauses, irrelevant information protection, and misidentification can invalidate NDAs. The infamous Trump-Daniels case exemplifies these concerns. Crafting valid NDAs demands balancing secrecy and free speech, with courts assessing the information\’s value, NDA scope, fairness, and public interest.
When NDAs Go Too Far Read More »